Founding Florida Pilot
Bach Atlas is the Florida research and verification layer you can use before drafting. Research the matter, review the authorities, organize strategy and procedure, then hand the detailed legal foundation to Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, or the drafting AI you already use.
Solo and Team start with a 60-day paid pilot — no annual lock while you are still deciding. If Bach earns a permanent place in the workflow, keep the founding rate for the next 12 months. The first cohort is limited to 25 Florida practices.
Start with one real matter-style question. The pilot should prove the value before you make the annual decision.
Pilot Economics
Instead of asking a Florida attorney to sign an annual contract based on a demo, Bach starts with a paid evaluation on real work. The question is not whether the software looks impressive. The question is whether it repeatedly saves time, improves the research foundation, and makes the attorney’s existing drafting workflow stronger.
Solo Founding Pilot
$199 / month
60-day paid pilot · no annual lock.
| Decision Point | Common Status Quo | Founding Florida Pilot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Professional AI and legal-research software can require separate subscriptions before the workflow proves itself. | $199/month Solo · $599/month Team during the Founding Florida Pilot |
| Initial Commitment | Annual software decisions can force attorneys to decide before enough real matters have passed through the tool. | 60-day paid pilot for Solo and Team. No 12-month commitment during the pilot. |
| What You Are Testing | A demo or isolated prompt can look impressive without proving that the tool fits day-to-day legal work. | Use Bach on actual Florida questions, matter research, authority review, strategy work, and drafting handoffs. |
| Drafting AI | General AI may be asked to research, reason, cite, and draft inside the same session. | Keep Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, or your preferred drafting AI. Bach builds the researched legal foundation first. |
| Attorney Control | The lawyer still has to determine what authority is real, what supports the proposition, and what needs follow-up. | Authority Review, coverage limits, counsel-review status, and unresolved verification items stay visible. |
| If Bach Earns Its Place | Another procurement decision starts after the evaluation period. | Continue into a 12-month Founding Member term at the same pilot monthly rate, or choose optional annual prepay. |
| If It Does Not | Long contracts can make a poor-fit tool expensive to unwind. | Stop after the pilot. The annual relationship only begins if you choose to continue. |
Founding pricing is intentionally an early-cohort offer. Pilot fees buy active access during the evaluation period; the 12-month relationship begins only if the practice chooses to continue after the pilot. Capacity and other commercial terms are governed by the pilot agreement.
Sample Research Memos
These examples show the structure: confidence and coverage notes, micro answer, authority layers, practical roadmap, and suggested follow-up questions.
Certified payroll failures, Davis-Bacon, Miami-Dade responsible wage rules, 1099 misclassification, prime contractor exposure, and corrective action planning.
A multi-issue memo-prep package for attorney review: self-help doctrine, Chapter 720 pre-suit mediation, homeowner defenses, fee-shifting risk, Florida-Friendly Landscaping, FHA exposure, and filing sequence.
Local code, zoning, redevelopment approvals, Miami-Dade overlays, Live Local Act issues, and entitlement diligence for ZIP 33134.
Notice requirements, timing deadlines, lien priority, and consequences of defective or untimely construction-lien notices on private commercial projects.
A high-recognition Florida real-estate and litigation issue that shows Bach’s memo structure clearly.
A strong land-use sample showing how Bach handles local-government constraints and development conditions.
A stronger sample for commercial litigators, foreclosure counsel, and bankruptcy-adjacent work.
A direct-fit sample for IP, entertainment, and brand-adjacent attorneys evaluating licensing risk and structure.
Sample memos are provided for product evaluation only. They are not legal advice and are not a substitute for independent attorney review of current authorities.
Why Start With a Pilot
A legal-research platform should not win an annual contract because a demo looked good. During the pilot, Bach has to prove that it can repeatedly produce useful Florida research, keep the authority trail reviewable, support complex matters, and improve the work you hand to the drafting AI your practice already prefers.
Earn the Annual Relationship
Solo and Team begin with a 60-day paid pilot, not a 12-month lock. The goal is simple: Bach should earn a permanent place in the practice by doing real work.
Verifiable Research
Bach combines citation-backed research with Authority Review, coverage limitations, and a counsel-controlled review queue so the lawyer can verify instead of relying on unsupported AI confidence.
Florida Depth + Drafting Leverage
Research state and local authority, organize the matter, then hand the detailed Bach foundation to Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, or another approved drafting AI instead of asking the drafting model to rediscover the law from scratch.
Founding Florida Cohort
Early Solo and Team practices receive founder-led onboarding, direct workflow feedback, and the ability to keep the founding monthly rate if Bach earns the annual relationship after the pilot.
Advisory Economics
This pattern came up directly in a working session with a Florida construction-law attorney: flat-fee and retainer pricing becomes harder when each local-code question still requires hours of unbilled research. When the first research layer can be produced in minutes with citations and coverage notes, attorneys can scope, price, and review the work with more predictability.
Simple Payback Examples
Examples are illustrative only. Bach does not set legal fees, guarantee revenue, or replace professional fee judgment.
Output Reliability
A Stanford RegLab study published in 2024 found that leading legal AI tools still hallucinated on a meaningful share of tested legal queries, with reported rates ranging from roughly 1 in 6 to 1 in 3 depending on the product and task. Courts are also increasingly sanctioning lawyers for unverified AI-generated citations and fabricated authority. The point is not that national tools lack value. The point is that attorneys need answers grounded in real authority, with citations and coverage limits visible enough to verify.
Read the Stanford RegLab PaperBach’s Reliability Posture
Confidentiality-Aware Architecture
In United States v. Heppner, a 2026 Southern District of New York matter, the court rejected privilege and work-product claims over certain materials generated through a public AI tool under the facts presented there. The case makes the issue concrete: data handling, confidentiality expectations, and workflow design are no longer side concerns in legal AI. Bach Atlas is built for legal workflows with a different operating posture: no AI training on member queries, Customer Content, or generated outputs; tenant isolation; encryption; and account-history/deletion terms controlled through Bach’s agreement.
Built for Legal Workflows
Engagement Structure
The annual relationship comes after the evaluation, not before it. Solo and Team get 60 days to use Bach on actual matters. At the end, the practice decides whether the product has earned a 12-month place in the workflow. Government and in-house evaluations use a separately scoped 90-day pilot.
Step 1
Bring a Florida question, matter type, or workflow you already understand well enough to judge. We confirm that current Atlas coverage is a reasonable fit before the pilot starts.
Step 2
Solo is $199/month and Team is $599/month during the evaluation. Use Bach on real research, Authority Review, matter work, procedural issues, and drafting handoffs. No 12-month term has started yet.
Step 3
At the end of 60 days, look at the matters, time saved, quality of the research foundation, review workflow, and downstream drafting results. If Bach did not earn a permanent place, stop. No annual term begins.
Step 4
If you continue, the 12-month Founding Member term begins at the same monthly pilot rate. Solo may optionally prepay $1,990 for the year; Team may prepay $5,990. Renewal and other terms are handled in the applicable agreement.
FAQ
Solo and Team begin with a 60-day paid evaluation on real Florida matters. Solo is $199 per month and Team is $599 per month during the pilot. There is no 12-month commitment during those 60 days. The point is to let actual use — not a sales demo — determine whether Bach belongs in the practice.
If Bach has earned a place in the workflow, you can continue into a 12-month Founding Member term at the same monthly rate. Solo remains $199 per month and Team remains $599 per month for that founding term. Optional annual prepay is $1,990 for Solo or $5,990 for Team. If you do not continue, the pilot ends and no annual term begins.
No. Bach does not market deep legal research as unlimited. The pilot is intended for normal professional evaluation on real matters, and any research-capacity or fair-use terms are set in the applicable pilot agreement so the economics stay sustainable for both sides.
A research job is one structured research request. You submit a question, and Bach produces a citation-backed Florida research memo with relevant statutes, local authority, procedure, and case law where available. Most focused research jobs target completion within four to eight minutes.
The Founding Florida Pilot is designed to let you evaluate the real Atlas workflow, not a crippled demo. Solo and Team can use the available research, Authority Review, matter organization, Strategy Memo Prep, Procedural Roadmap, and Drafting & Review Handoff features that apply to their matters, subject to the pilot agreement and current product availability.
Yes. Bach is designed to fit around tools attorneys already use. It is not a replacement for a citator, and it does not require you to abandon a preferred drafting AI. Bach builds the Florida research and verification foundation; the attorney can then use other research systems for good-law review and any approved drafting model for the final work product.
The first 25 Florida practices accepted into the Solo or Team pilot receive founder-led onboarding and the opportunity to keep the founding monthly rate for the 12-month term if they continue after the pilot. This is intentionally a small cohort so Bach can stay close to early users and learn from real workflows.
Yes. Government legal departments and in-house teams can discuss a scoped 90-day pilot. User count, practice areas, research capacity, support, and deployment terms are agreed before the pilot starts so the evaluation matches the department’s actual use case.
Bach Atlas does not train AI models on member queries, Customer Content, or generated outputs. Research history may be stored in Bach-controlled systems to support saved searches, matter history, account access across devices, exports, and related product functionality. Customer Content is handled under the applicable agreement, including deletion, backup-retention, and legal-retention terms. Attorneys remain responsible for their own confidentiality, privilege, and professional obligations.
Florida legal research often requires reconciling state statutes, county codes, municipal ordinances, local procedures, and regulatory layers that generic workflows can miss. Bach is going deep on Florida first. Additional states can be added over time when coverage can be built to the same standard.
No. Bach Atlas is a research and verification support tool for licensed professionals. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, is not a citator, and does not replace professional judgment, good-law review, client counseling, privilege analysis, or review of the underlying authorities and final work product.
Founder-Led Access
The first 25 accepted Florida practices form the founding cohort. Bach stays deliberately close to those users during the pilot so product decisions come from real research matters, attorney review behavior, and the drafting workflows that actually create leverage.
Want to Decide From Evidence Instead of a Sales Pitch?
Bring one Florida question you know well enough to challenge. Inspect how Bach structures the research, exposes the authorities and limits, and decide whether a 60-day pilot is worth running.
Want to see output first? Polk County HOA · Lis Pendens · Exactions · Trademark Licensing
Bach Atlas is a research support tool for licensed professionals. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and does not replace professional judgment, independent verification, client counseling, privilege analysis, or review of underlying authorities.
Not sure which pilot fits?
Request a Pilot Fit Check →